Terms for Test
Bandwagon
Dangling Comparative
Superlative Swindle
Pay You Tuesday
Blame Game
Glittering Generalities
Misnomer
Frame it and Claim it
Weasel Words
Eye Candy
The "Average" Bear
The Baseline Bluff
The Literally True Falsehood
The Implied Falsehood
The Moonbat Effect
The Psychology of Deception
The Root for my side Trap
The Pictures in our head Trap
The I Know I'm Right Trap
The Close Call Trap
Fog of War
Doublespeak
Not all "Studies" are equal
Blind Men and the Elephant
Extraordinary Claims demand Extraordinary Evidence
Selling False Hope
Know Who's Talking
Know What Counts
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Dangling Comparative
Superlative Swindle
Pay You Tuesday
Blame Game
Glittering Generalities
Misnomer
Frame it and Claim it
Weasel Words
Eye Candy
The "Average" Bear
The Baseline Bluff
The Literally True Falsehood
The Implied Falsehood
The Moonbat Effect
The Psychology of Deception
The Root for my side Trap
The Pictures in our head Trap
The I Know I'm Right Trap
The Close Call Trap
Fog of War
Doublespeak
Not all "Studies" are equal
Blind Men and the Elephant
Extraordinary Claims demand Extraordinary Evidence
Selling False Hope
Know Who's Talking
Know What Counts
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
publication1.pub | |
File Size: | 2121 kb |
File Type: | pub |
Click here to link to the Global Media Analysis homepage
Election 2012
Preliminary Survey available
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2Z272FP
Feel free to orientate yourself on the politics of our candidates with either the links below or the newsitems at the bottom, then take the preliminary poll, which although it doesn't count as a vote, informs the candidates on tactical moves.
Actual election ballots will be opened Novembetr 5 and 6 for electors.
Feel free to orientate yourself on the politics of our candidates with either the links below or the newsitems at the bottom, then take the preliminary poll, which although it doesn't count as a vote, informs the candidates on tactical moves.
Actual election ballots will be opened Novembetr 5 and 6 for electors.
Election Site Map
Newsfeeds (Daily)
Below (Underneath the Electors)
Note to the Electors: Please consider the source and use this as the independent media's outlet / reaction to what is sent in to our office. For Campaign point of views, you may go to the platforms and/or campaign pages in the locations listed below.
Also remember, really the voting is the thing. Whatever swayed and dissuaded you will be based on the campaigns actions / reactions / inactions. Just vote as you normally would based upon your voter reaction.
Please leave any comments at the following: these suggestions/reactions will be fantastic indicators as to your voter sensibilities. Again, thank you for your time. EDM
http://demott.weebly.com/voters-reaction-blog.html
Platforms
at: http://demott.weebly.com/platforms.html
Campaign Pages
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-a-bruce-wayne.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-b-aang.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-c-oscar-the-grouch.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-d-tony-stark.html or www.stark2012.weebly.com (official Stark campaign website)
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-e-courage-the-cowardly-dog.html or www.courageforpresident.weebly.com (official Courage campaign website)
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-f-big-bird.html
Voters Survey (To Be Opened November 5th and 6th)
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/voting-survey.html
Campaign Ads
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/voting-survey.html
Also see Banners at:
http://demott.weebly.com/
Also see Commercials at:
Big Bird
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoM92yyR3Ws&feature=plcp
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/update-big-bird/1419930/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e90X0_nX1q8
Courage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irWMi6_aGoY&feature=autoplay&list=HL1351166435&playnext=1
Aang and Courage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcnuXGv15Rw
Bruce Wayne
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTF9_q4Sk-U&feature=plcp
Events, etc.
TBA
Below (Underneath the Electors)
Note to the Electors: Please consider the source and use this as the independent media's outlet / reaction to what is sent in to our office. For Campaign point of views, you may go to the platforms and/or campaign pages in the locations listed below.
Also remember, really the voting is the thing. Whatever swayed and dissuaded you will be based on the campaigns actions / reactions / inactions. Just vote as you normally would based upon your voter reaction.
Please leave any comments at the following: these suggestions/reactions will be fantastic indicators as to your voter sensibilities. Again, thank you for your time. EDM
http://demott.weebly.com/voters-reaction-blog.html
Platforms
at: http://demott.weebly.com/platforms.html
Campaign Pages
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-a-bruce-wayne.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-b-aang.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-c-oscar-the-grouch.html
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-d-tony-stark.html or www.stark2012.weebly.com (official Stark campaign website)
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-e-courage-the-cowardly-dog.html or www.courageforpresident.weebly.com (official Courage campaign website)
http://demott.weebly.com/candidate-f-big-bird.html
Voters Survey (To Be Opened November 5th and 6th)
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/voting-survey.html
Campaign Ads
at:
http://demott.weebly.com/voting-survey.html
Also see Banners at:
http://demott.weebly.com/
Also see Commercials at:
Big Bird
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoM92yyR3Ws&feature=plcp
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/update-big-bird/1419930/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e90X0_nX1q8
Courage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irWMi6_aGoY&feature=autoplay&list=HL1351166435&playnext=1
Aang and Courage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcnuXGv15Rw
Bruce Wayne
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTF9_q4Sk-U&feature=plcp
Events, etc.
TBA
The Candidates
Please vote for one pair...
|
|
The Electors(Red - Confirmed Electors)The following tentative electors will represent their "states" in voting. Each "state" will have a number of electoral points, based mainly upon the population of the department x2 or based upon the position of the department/administrator (but not always). These points are deliniated in order and displayed in brackets. Each elector is a representation for the group and it is up to them as to the level of information allocated to their "people" . All and all, the electors should consider the feelings of their "group" while casting their votes. The vote, however is completely based upon the electors ballot. The following three columns represent three systems of governance: namely Winner Take All, 50/50 and Popular Sovereignty.
Voting will take place from November 1st to November 6th, and should be based upon the actual reactions of the electors on the campaigns of each candidate, including the newsfeeds. These items will be updated regularly. |
Winner Take AllThe vote of the elector represents all the points in the brackets.
(50) Sophomore reps* *Consensus vote needed Electors: Steffi Adams Reid Wolfe Chris Hamilton Taylor Jacobson (36) Admin Elector: Camenisch (32) Special Ed Elector: Smith (30) World Languages Elector: Gisele Falls (26) Office/Security/ Subs/Custodial Elector: Kiser (18) Health and PE Elector: Platte (14) Fine Arts Elector: Campbell (12) Guidance Elector: Shelstad Note: No voting rights for Access Coordinator and Student Support specialists, as well as guidance secretaries (10) Business and Marketing Elector: Pringle (8) Tech Ed Elector: Gradney (8) Clinic Elector: Winner (7) Specialists Elector: Pickett (4) Gifted Elector: L. Walker (4) Distance Learning Elector: Plymale |
50/50The vote of the assigned electors represents an even split in the points in the brackets (e.g. 2 electors for a state worth 10 points = 5 points per elector; 4 electors for a state worth 12 points = 3 points per elector)
(100) Senior reps Electors: Arielle Hankerson (student) Liz Hawker (student) Andrew Steinwand(student) Matt Zielig (student) (60) Junior reps Electors: Brandon Flores (student) Lorelna Voliva (student) Reyna Smith (student) (38) Social Studies LaRoue K. Walker (34) English Electors: Waagan Gonzales No voting rights, department heads / family of department heads (28) Science Electors: Jones Quinn |
Popular SovereigntyThe vote is evenly split based upon the number of votes by the group members (e.g. if there is a group that has 10 points, 30% vote for candidate g, 20% vote for candidate h, 40% vote for candidate i, and 10% votes for candidate j, each candidate would receive that percentage of the points - 3,2,4,1 respectively). Any non-voter loses the point. The elector would submit the survey results to the elecoral board by the deadline.
(50) Freshman rep Elector: Greg Falls (student) (30) Math Elector: Graham No voting rights for any member with less than five years experience at Tallwood High School (11) Cafeteria Elector: Sheppard (8) FACE Elector: Chadwick |
Newsfeed
Sunday Political Roundup
NBC
11/4/2012
Investigation Continues
What has police departments around the nation asking questions to the Department of Justice's investigation on Tony Stark's near death experience is the incredible lack of evidence. No leads, no bullet, no witnesses, not even a viable interview leaves officers such as Brandon Larkson or Indianapolis asking: did it really happen? In a Politics around the nation interview on NBC's Sunday morning, Larkson, alongside three other officers from different regions, were asked who will they give their support to"I'm a pragmatist. If there's no evidence, there's no crime." When asked what to make of this, the discussion round tabled to finish with a concensus view from the four guests that (in the words of Officer Mandy Wright (Oklahoma) "Stark took a Stark bullet from a Stark gun with a Stark shooter, probably from a Stark campaign official, so that the nation can give Stark support." Felix Wilson (California) agreed, citing the poll numbers immediate spike, and the interesting parallel the incident had to Courage's abrupt hospitalization.
ABC
Two Types, One Choice
Political Junkie and ABC Political Roundtable host, Justine Oliver gives her views on the teams now running for President. In a discussion with call ins, Oliver made a major distinction between two "camps of candidates" - those who are Issues Candidates, and those who are Character Candidates.
In the first camp, Oliver brings out the Aang-Courage team's leadership on setting policy regarding expenditure. "All may not agree with the math or the allocations," said Oliver, "but all should note that the plan is comprehensive and logical." Oliver seemed to dismiss the commentary on the character attack on the military, stating that Aang, while making the comments, was speaking from an economic lens. "War costs money, there's no way around it; it just makes sense, in fact, it just makes dollars and cents, that cutting back on warmongering will increase the nation's coffers, especially since most of the wars are not wars of conquest or resource enrichment."
The Big Bird-Blossom team also falls in the issues camp, according to Oliver, and citing what is now called the LaRoue "near endorsement," echoed the idea that the platform is laid out for all the world to see. The no platform platform of other candidates simply pale in comparison. Big Bird's accidental flight on a supply plane managed to get laughs from critics, but also did wonders for his campaign in terms of action. For once Big Bird got away from the microphone and interacted with the people. This move seemed to electrify the movement, in part because some have, according to Oliver, "misaligned Big Bird with Corporate Media networks." Oliver pushed away such claims with a simple statement: "forty years of working for the country in a public, non-corporate network should be enough to disprove this." Oliver did make one criticism in her comments regarding the Big Bird, when a caller from Georgia asked about the VP choice. According to Oliver, "Blossum offers nothing to the campaign, and the selection was probably based upon two factors: gender and action. The first seems nominal at best; the second is a connotation, and one that doesn't match with Big Bird's own character. This VP selection, I think, is a lost opportunity for a strong candidate"
Oliver placed the Wayne-Franco, OTG-Prince, and Stark-Rogers campaign in the Character camp. "All three are running on star power and supposed values. The question is not what will these candidates do if elected President, but rather what will they stand for." The first team, although filled with compassion at the heart of Sandy, with Wayne machinery working through the night, seems, in Oliver's word choice, "staged." This concept is repeated throughout the campaign in the use of photoOps as a campaign technique and an attack on Big Bird's campaign by a catchy "Big Bird? Big Mistake" tagline being the only commercial to go national. The iconic pictures that will come from this campaign no doubt will fill many a teenage bedroom wall, but the fact that silence on anything issue orientated is a campaign strategy have many asking "how mysterious do we want our President to be?" Oliver's final commentary on the Wayne-Franco campaign was in response to the Georgia caller's VP question, where Oliver called Franco "Junior" and the partnership as an "obvious attempt to create another Wayne for the next generation." Her political read was that the campaign "might as well be called the Wayne-Wayne campaign"
Oliver did not hold back with the OTG commentary in her third segment, stating that the "five minutes" she allotted for commentary on the candidate was "more substance" than the entirety of the Grouch Campaign had to offer. The almost "laughable non-commitment" to anything Presidential makes her wonder why there are still supporters for the OTG-Prince campaign. Then, straying from her normal political pundancy, Oliver feigns mock enlightenment in saying: lol, OMG it's OTG and the text generation, admitting, albeit humoursly, that Oscar must simply speak a different language and very well might be the choice for the new generation, then in sardonic reversal. "Unfortunately, alongside their Bieber loyalty, most of his supporters can't vote yet. "
Saving her final comments for what some are seeing as her own "near endorsement," Oliver stated that perhaps the best Character candidate, in fact Character team of candidates, is the Stark-Rogers partnership. "Although clouded in controversy, as is Stark's fashion, both are seen as can-do candidates; both are seen as equals, rather than a quick political add on; both are seen as straightforward and truthful; both are seen as all American." When a caller from Oregon questioned this final claim, noting the alleged sale of arms to both sides of a war in the 1990s, making Stark the billionaire that he is today, Oliver waved her hand aside, stating that "if every unproven report on Stark were true, he'd at least make an interesting story. " Then turning serious for a moment, echoed the statement made by Stark earlier in the year that: "if looking at the record of a company, look at the company record, look at those in charge, look at those who answer to whom, and treat the company as a company. You will find that those people no longer work for Stark enterprises. If looking at a record of a person, look then at the heart of the person, and what that person has done for God and country. I'll let the archives of history be my witness"
And so, Issues vs. Character seem to be the two main candidate camps in this year's elections.
11/4/2012
Aang commissions Presidential portrait
What does supporting the arts and the President of the US have in common? Well, if Aang is elected, apparently a lot. Given the fact that this campaign, now down to five strong candidates, has never seen a clear leader, Aang decided to go to SoHo this weekend to find the artist who will make history. Backed by supporter dollars, Aang spent his afternoon on a photoshoot where artistic hopefuls sought his commission money, and their place in the art history books to be the one to be accredited to either his Presidential portrait or his Runner up portrait. Tuesday's results will tell which one this portrait will become. Those wishing to see the artwork produced during this session, both the actual portrait and the photos leading up to it can find a calendar of art gallery showings; all ticket sales will go into a disaster relief fund run by an independent NGO.
11/4/2012
From the Big Bird Campaign Central
In reaction to Hurricane Sandy, Big Bird announced Wednesday, the creation of an outreach program for the schools in affected cities. “We created a program in which kids in schools all over the country donate school supplies to help restock the schools that were destroyed. From Maine to North Carolina we want to help the children get back in school, and consequently, regain their normal lives,” said Mr. Bird. He is also supporting a ‘pen pal’ network. He wants students to learn about the effects of Hurricane Sandy on the kids in affected states. He said, “The children will be able to support others across the country, not necessarily through money, but through words.” He plans to match up schools in different states, and have each child assigned a pen pal. This program will help kids living in destroyed neighborhoods have comfort by knowing that students in other places are thinking about them. Mr. Bird’s announcement took place a few days after the storm because he was helping his neighbors on Sesame Street clean up from the damage.
11/4/2012
From the Aang/Courage Campaign Central
Reprint from 11/1/12
EXCERPT FROM:
The Oprah Magazine
Editorial, Theresa Marie
After the VP nominations became official for each of the candidates Oprah sat with the candidates to discuss the possibility of election into office. Healthcare, education, and other policies were discussed; but the highlight of the interviews came when character, personality, and family came into question. Tony Stark, Bruce Wayne, and Aang have each come a long way from broken families. The early departure of family members and friends in their lives has gained the sympathy vote for many of Oprah’s fans. (Though many fans were probably still swooning at the thought of our two notorious ladies’ men.)
Aang’s interview in particular showed Oprah the dedication and care put into Aang’s new family: his wife Katara and his son Tenzin. The two have been admirably supporting Aang and they welcome Courage with open arms into their candidacy.
Courage’s illness left him hospitalized during the interview days, but he was not forgotten. Katara and Tenzin, in agreement with Aang that he needed their support, flew out to Hawaii to help Courage gain his strength. Courage’s condition, after hearing of the heroism shown during Hurricane Sandy by many of his beloved American brothers and sisters, seemed to lighten. The three figures sat in the hospital room, tightly clasping one another’s hands, listening to the current list of casualty names, and sent their prayers to the deceased and to the families.
Courage knew what it felt like to be on the brink of death. He knows what last regrets sounded like, he knows what strength a loving hand brings, and he knows that Aang can help. Aang, who had been working on restoring a sense normalcy to the East Coast, was on the same page. Together the two are not just working on normalcy, but on improvement. Aang gave Oprah a hint that addressing natural disaster and environmental issues ranks in the top ten “presidential improvements”, as Oprah phrased it, on his list.
“These two were the underdogs,” said Oprah, “but I think that together…They have a shot at not only winning, but at making a stronger America.”
11/3/2012
The Daily Minute
The World's Wacky One Minute News Capsule
Cheever, Ohio
Bob Austin's basement
In ironic fashion, OTG's campaign speech came to an abrupt halt when a modernday soothsayer, with bullhorn in hand, announced the end of the world the day after the elections. This surprise announcement took place after OTG played his advertisement containing the other canidates in silhouette against the backdrop of a mushroom cloud, and Oscar stating: "I'm going to clean up Washington!"
Stark's near death experience, and consequent bandaid (it's only a flesh wound) have some asking why he is extending his stay there. Perhaps to soak in the warm Philadephia rays of sun; perhaps because he needs more water? According to hospital records (and yes, apparently they do keep such records as these), Stark broke a record in calling for a nurse (presumably for the aforementioned water) seventeen times within his day long stay. I hope that's how he'll deal with terrorists on the Presidential Red phone!
Big Bird responds to Sally by reaching out. In a PSA announcement the big yellow candidate step off the tarmac to deliver his I will help you speech. Unbeknownst to the pilot of Big Bird One, however, the airstrip was reserved for a supply plane coming in minutes later. Behind the Big Bird, one can see, a quick taxi out of his own airplane and a quick landing of the supply plane. Once the speech was done, Big Bird was hurried off to his next location to give his next speech, which apparently was in all the areas that needed supplies. Big Bird took it in good fashion, stating: "I guess that I was just supposed to help deliver these supplies"
Bruce Wayne, frightened? In a campaign plug that included the Wayne - Franco team touring the Chicago zoo (presumably to show how family friendly they are, and also to sell the pictures that came from the event as a fundraiser for Sally victims), it was neither the donkey nor the elephant that got the paparazzi snapping their shutters, but the creepy and crawly. In the snake house, zookeepers had a surprise for the team, and draped them both in boa constrictors for a photo op. Two pictures, however, topped sales for this unique fundraiser. The first is Franco tenderly touching the glass that separated him from the world's largest spider. The second, in eerie green night vision, is that of Wayne visiting the nocturnal house, where zookeepers decided to surprise the presidential candidate by releasing the bats. For most, this would be a heart stopping experience. Wayne, however, hardly blinked an eye, and looked as stoic as the Mt. Rushmore faces in the Black Hills.
Aang and Courage on Oprah? In what some call a staged performance, the underdogs are now the endorsed. Oprah Winfrey, who earlier hosted Aang's presidential announcement made it official in stating that these two candidates will make a "stronger America". Almost on cue, Courage then proceeded to faint in his chair, and slide, slinky-like, to the floor, having Oprah quickly call for commercial. The hot Oprah stage lighting was determined to be the cause.
11/2/2012
Tony Stark Grazed by Bullet at Rally
Philadephia Sun
Associated Press
Investigations are underway after Presidential candidate Tony Stark had to be rushed to the hospital due to an attempt on his life in the center of historic Philadelphia. Doctors state that other than a scare, Stark's condition is remarkably good. In preparation for what some called his pre-acceptance acceptance speech, S
tark climbed the few steps of the stairs that led him to the presentation platform. Before reaching the top, he fell, in what seemed like an embarassing stumble, but when he failed to get up, aids rushed to check on him, and found his neck filled with blood. Though it all ended up being "just a scratch" with a lot of blood, Stark's life could have easily ended had the bullet found its way about an inch and a half away from where he was hit.
Police are remaining quiet about the details of the investigation and promise to give a statement once more details are known. Speculations are notfd as quiet, however. Stark as president could see more such attempts on his life, and have many asking, who would want Stark dead even before he becomes President. Will America be safer as a result if he's actual elected? This question is perhaps unanswerable. But certainly the nurses at Philadelphia Central hospital might not be safe from Stark's prowess.
Word is, Stark's survival might mean his victory. Upon first reporting, pollsters noted that Stark jumped a remarkable 12 points in the polls, a feat only accomplished by the Aang campaign teaming up with Courage, the now VP candidate who collapsed in Hawaii while campaigning.
11/1/2012
Denver Daily
Letter to the Editor
Dear Editor Thoms:
I was so happy when I turned 18 last year, not only because of the seeming freedoms that came with that "magic" age, but more importantly, because I knew I could exercise my right to vote. Ever since my grandfather took me on a road trip to our capital when I was eight, I dreamed of this moment. It seemed as if I could make a postitive contribution to this great land. So, why, I ask you, do the candidates prefer to keep the other candidates down with constant mudslinging. Whether asking for a vote from a first time voter like me, or asking for support from someone who first went to the polls to vote in the 1936 election, candidates should really attempt to win or vote instead of having us lose faith in the other candidates. I mean really, if this were any other situation, it would be ridiculous. Imagine disrespecting all the other job applicants when you are being interviewed; or winning that special someone's hand in marriage because you were better at talking trash than her other option.
So, editor, I implore you to publish only the positive and make this land the land of optimism and opportunity even in how we present ourselves.
John Gilgameshi, registered voter
10/31/2012
Anchorage Report
Associated Press
The impeachment of Ms. Taylor Jacobson from her own group members earlier this day was swift and final. Jacobson walked away from the courthouse without the position of Elector, leaving those who voted for her dismissal with 25% more voting power. The Stark campaign welcomed her home with honor and immediately sought out to investigate other questionable electors, namely that of high point bearing electors of Falls, Falls, and LaRoue, the latter having issued a very public leaning for candidate Big Bird, whose campaign office offered no comment to what is being considered a defacto endorsement.
10/31/2012
VP candidates unmasked
Elk River University Chronicle
The Ozark's Alternative News Source
The Presidential hopefuls are down to five as Courage steps down official from the running for the highest office in the land, stating that due to uncertain health problems, he simply cannot lead the country down the path of uncertainty. In his thank you speech to his supporters, he threw his entire support to the Aang Campaign. In turn Aang immediately brought Courage aboard in asking if he'd be kind enough to be the nation's number two.
Other campaigns managed to submit their picks to the Federal Election committee just in time to be accepted. Bruce Wayne chose actor, writer, scholar James Franco, perhaps to capture the younger voters and break that very traditional image of his without contradicting his values. Tony Stark also sought the young voters in turning to long time friend Steve Rogers, sometimes known for his touring as the patriotic Captain America in military presentations.
The leader in the polls, Big Bird, and the leader in the swag, OTG, both went nontraditional and selected females for their campaigns, Blossom (of Power Puff fame) for Big Bird, and Diana Prince (the Wonder Women of military intelligence fame, and former army nurse) for Oscar the Grouch have both accepted the nomination.
And as the teams are set to pit against each other: Wayne/Franco, Aang/Courage, Stark/Rogers, OTG/Prince, and Bird/Blossom, the world is set to react.
Big News Day
10/30/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Honolulu Express
Courage Calls for Support
Presidentially candidate Courage the Cowardly Dog remains hospitalized today after a collapse from exhaustion. Doctors say that he has taken a turn for the worse, and family members were calling for a priest. In and out of consciousness, Courage was observed as saying; "let them fight on...let my .... good people.... of the United.... States fight.....on from the Hills of South Dakota, to the waters of Lake Michigan, to the lowlands of California and the tundra of Fairbanks.... let them fight the good ..... cause." Campaign officials say that they appreciate the letters of support, but hope that the senders of the letters will also send a strong message to Congress that Courage will be the next President of the United States.
10/30/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
MSNBC
Conan's Surprise Guest
Arguably one of the most influential and point bearing electors, Ms. K. LaRoue, decided a trip to her favorite crazed comedian Conan O'Brien was in order to announce her "leaning" towards the Big yellow candidate. In her own words, LaRoue, when asked who she would vote for, stated: I'll be honest, based on the current information available, I'm leaning towards Big Bird!" LaRoue cited the fact that she liked the comprehensive nature of his platform and added: "Plus, the celebrity endorsements are impressive."
This near endorsement can be seen as a full fledged endorsement, especially when one considers the venue. When considering LaRoue's point value as well as the results of day one of the preliminary polls (see article below), Big Bird seems a clear leader.
In response, and perhaps also as a slight to the cowardice (often referred to as "being yellow") of Courage, the Cowardly Dog, O'Brien responded in perfect form with having his audience chant: "He ain't yellow, he's my fellow!" while holding up a card featuring a silhouette of Big Bird. "On my show we are completely unbiased as to politics, and this card in my hands represents the solemn promise we make to stay this way. This silhouette is ambigious enough to represent anyone of our candidates." In stark contrast of his quibbings, the card showed the eight foot bird next to the petit forms of average man.
Conan, in his own way, joined leagues with LaRoue and the multitude of celebrity endorsements that give candidates the tidal wave they need to win a major victory.
10/30/2012
Day One Preliminary Poll Results
Only four questions are asked in the preliminary poll, but the two most intriquing are the first two, namely who would you vote for and who wouldn't you vote for. In both categories there are definite leads.
As of midnight, the results are thus.
For the first question: who would you vote for: Big Bird has a 20 point spread on the triple tie for second (Aang, Courage, and Oscar) In a distant third, also in a three way tie are Wayne, Stark and "Not Sure", leaving the two playboys not much to play with.
The second question: who would you NOT vote for: Wayne takes a decisive lead, doubling the percentages against second placers Tony Stark (and the surprise entry) Big Bird, showing that the populist candidate isn't popular amongst all demographics. An equal percentage falls in the "Not Sure" category. Out of the fire with no votes in this category are Aang, Courage and Oscar.
The other two questions relate to issues and character traits, and responses vary greatly in the first category, but are fairly consistent in the second, with the same concept being submitted by polltakers in various forms.
In the issues question, the top response was education, however, the environment, foreign policy, social issues and ensuring equality for all made strong showings for what respondants are concerned about.
In reference to the final question regarding desirable presidential character traits, respondants felt that a President should be honest, have integrity, and be principled. The only variation is that the President should be fiscally responsible, which could easily be taken as an economic form of honesty and with integrity.
Candidates should be careful of taking this poll as a true barometer as all pundits will tell you, day one of polling is often less than representative because less people vote early on and the true test is shown as the poll continues. Preliminary polling will remain open until November 4th. Actual voting is scheduled for electors only on November 5th / 6th.
10/30/2012
The Dark Horse Becomes the Dark Knight
EXCERPT FROM:
Forbes Magazine
Bruce Wayne was never one to waste time; this concept in fact is a tradition in his long ancestral commerce genes. Some may say that campaigning for the highest office in the nation seemed a bit of a waste of time for him; as of late, Wayne had hardly even remembered that he was running for President and offered not a peep to the 250 million or so eligible voters, after all the business decisions during the day and social gatherings during the night, the man needs his beauty sleep. Bruce Wayne, for some, was been a name synonymous with inaction. After all, his stocks do all his work for him...and much of those were, afterall part of his inheritance. What does he do with all that time? Couldn't he, say, present a platform, give a speech, kiss a baby...do something, well, a bit like a Presidential candidate would.
Yet his beloved Gotham loves him; the strong silent type who just happens to have his own butler and mansion and money to burn. The South too loves him, and the deeper the south, the deeper the love.
To be fair, those who don't love him generally don't hate him; they just don't know him, leaving him and what he does with all that money a secret to the average Joe Lunchbox. Unlike his competition, who have to perform degrading acts of fundraising for their campaigns, all of Wayne's costs are out of pocket, and therefore, as a private investment, not necessary to share with the public.
Yet, this secrecy, this almost hidden second Wayne has eyebrows raising as Wayne hit the news like a storm....like a perfect storm called Sandy. The dark horse turned a dark knight. When citizens affected by this week's horrific hurricane asked the candidates, "what are you going to do?" Wayne did not answer with words; rather with action. To date, no other candidate issued statements. Wayne Enterprise boats, staffed by not only lower ranking employees and senior officials, but by Wayne himself, patrolled the waters of the Hudson, ferrying (according to some reports) over one hundred citizens of the coast to the safety of a shelter. Meanwhile the buzz of helicopters could be heard above as attic rescues were taking place in waterlogged neighborhoods where local officials could not traverse.
Such was the ninja like response of Wayne, that the compassionate Wayne, the empathetic Wayne, the Wayne of the People shown in the darkness of Sandy's cloudcover and torrential rains, and he stood, suitcoat flapping in the wind like a superheroes cape, barking out orders to save those in harms way.
Now only hours old, the night is an almost legendary one, one that includes iconic pictures virally racing through the virtual world. The secrecy remains; however, but it is a secrecy with purpose, resulting in a very new Bruce Wayne reigning supreme.
Strange to say, with hindsight, or with blindsight, it almost seems a relief to see what a candidate will do as in the heroic action displayed by Wayne, rather than hear what he promises to do, like the two score and three presidents before. If one does wish to read his platforms and see his newest advertisements, this too is possible, as the official release from his campaign office went out this morning, leaving the presumptive leaders of the race in a very precarious positions.
10/29/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Yahoo News:
Courage hospitalized for exhaustion.
After running like a dog through a record fifteen states in fifteen days, Courage tirelessly gave tarmac speech after tarmac speech, gathering huge crowds to his "this underdog needs your vote" speech. After a whirlwind tour of Hawaii on Saturday, the candidate collapsed midspeech. Doctors say that exhaustion is the cause and ordered a day rest for the candidate. He is now spending the day in Honolulu taking in liquids and being serviced by the very health care system he proposes to change for the better. His campaign office states that the one day rest will not slow him down, and all scheduled speeches will continue in Milwaukee, Ann Arbor, Indianapolis, Louisville, Colombus, and Wheeling. For those in Tacoma, Boise, and Salt Lake City, Courage is already working on the livefeed speeches to his supporters via webcam from the beach, where he is expected to thank them for standing out in the rain waiting for his plane to land, while he was hospitalized. Courage is to be certain to have an umbrella in his drink to show symbolic unity with those who had umbrellas while waiting for his arrival. Cleverly, Courage is making the best of the situation and turing this misfortune into a campaign slogan, saying "hey voters, I got you covered!"
10/28/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Hannibal Digest:
Hurricane Sandy victims ask candidates what they are going to do as President regarding natural disaster preparation. Georgette Stephenson who had the misfortune of moving from Hurricane Katrina flooded Mississippi to the area most likely to be hit the hardest this Tuesday, said it plainly: "Whoever wins this election will be paying for my repair, so I ask what are you going to do?" Oliver Ungst, of New York echoed this sentiment, and added: "we can't stop mother nature, but we can institute policies that can make the hardship less hard, and start building infrastructures that will prevent some of this hardship."
10/27/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
The Gomez Report: WEBH, Boston
Editorial, Marcus Gomez
VEEPS ready to jump in.
The world awaits the announcement on the number two position in American politics. No candidate has given their decisions as of yet, though a Wednesday deadline is approaching fast.
Therefore, here are my simple suggestions on how each candidate should select their Vice President, from yours truly, Marcus Gomez.
After doing this radio broadcast for the past fifteen years,and after having interviewed many important people on many important topics. I think I know a thing or two about politics, business, education and the like, my first suggestion for all the candidates is to select me. Why not? a man of the people, a huge fan base, representing diversity and charm, and a heck of a good looking guy to boot...I look great in Hugo Boss, if your buying and even better in a Presidential limo. Call me at the station, and I'll tell you where to send it.
I know I'll have to beat the offers off with a stick, so I'll also suggest a couple of other thoughts on the matter.
Bruce Wayne - someone a little less mysterious, someone a bit more with the people, someone who can take a region with their personality. Maybe female, though the traditional pull of male authority might actually be a larger gain from Wayne. If going for New England, female would be acceptable, maybe even seen as a major positive in segregating the Wayne - Stark similarities in many voters eyes. If going for the rural midwest, female would be a liability, not so much because of the gender, but because it would be seen as a political move on Wayne's part.
Aang - Aang has the middle; now he needs to go coastal. A conservative approach would be to gain points in the disputed east coast where there's no clear leader. A bold approach would be to try to take California and / or Florida. Whether successful or not, this may be seen as a move in the right direction and gain points in states not even thought about. Also, as far as direction is concerned, Aang needs to look ahead 50 years and ask what it is that the nation will want then in a Presidential candidate. That should be his VP.
Oscar the Grouch- OTG has the toughest position in VP selection, namely because he is running on RedBull power and the swag meter is way up. He cannot go too different, therefore reducing his own swag; he cannot go too similar, therefore not taking advantage of the concept of selecting someone that supplements his weakness. He therefore has to go for someone of equal swag value, but in a region where he is sitting in a comfortable second place. He definitely should not attempt a bold move that will attempt to gain the voters who are against him. He'll never get their votes and any attempt would be a simple waste of time.
Tony Stark - Stark needs to be himself. Pick from the heart. Don't worry about anyone's opinions because as soon as he starts taking political orders or makes political moves, he will cease being Tony Stark.
Courage the Cowardly Dog - I never thought I'd say this, because it seems like a cop out, but here is the rare occassion where one candidate asking another candidate for assistance might just be the winning combination. A Courage-Aang 2012 campaign might just take it. (Incidentally so might an Aang-Courage 2012). Both are complementary enough and different enough to make it happen. I just don't want to be around during the coin toss that decides who leads whom.
Big Bird-If anyone can pull off an unorthodox VEEP, it's Big Bird. Whether female, or ethnic, or regionally underrepresented, Big Birds keep it clean campaigning gives a real sense of genuinity. Here's another rare suggestion from Gomez (pick me, pick me, pick me): do not go traditional, do not look at the map, do not count points. Simply be genuine, and in the process, stay away from Oscar. He's a good guy, he lives in a garbage can, he's got a lot to say, but he's not you Big Bird. Maybe a Ronald McDonald, or maybe Blue - or Blue's Clues fame...combine the two of you...and you'll get Oscar and the rest green with envy.
10/26/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Washington Times
Associated Press
Congress calls for a comprehensive election investigation as things tighten up in the preseidential race. This latest action comes mainly from two Senators: Patricia Snow from Nebraska, and Randolph Underwood from South Dakota. Both point to election fraud regarding electors Jacobson and the Falls family. In the first case, Snow highlights a recent radio promo commissioned by Jacobson which directly stated:
As all of the campaigners shape up in to able candidates, I see those who seemed to be the underdogs grow into strong competitors. This is turning into quite a tight race. Anthony Stark for President.
The endorsement is seen as a violation of conflict of interests regulations in the elector bylaws. As Snow, a federal senator, can make complaint and / or call for an investigation, the issue is to be ultimately resolved from the deparmental level, meaning the authority to enforce the rules is up to the members of the group. Should the other electors select to oust Jacobson from the electors circle, their own point values will go up. Should they select to keep Jacobson in, they very well might be allowing in a political point for Stark, who is at this point viewed as a frontrunner. Political considerations for the decision are not clear cut because, among other things, other voters may view whichever decision is made as a political move...and all the electors from this camp are also officials for their particular candidates, meaning that what seemed an advantage early on (i.e. political voice for the campaigners) now may bring the overall acceptance of these candidates down.
In the case of the Falls, i.e. Gisele Falls, elector representing a Winner Take All 30 points, and Greg Falls, elector representing a Popular Sovereignty 50 points, there is a different federal approach to the issue. Underwood, who begins the investigation this Tuesday, has a weak case, according to not only political pundits, but also his colleagues in Congress. In a statement made last Friday, Underwood questioned how the mother and son relationship between the two electors might influence the voting. The senator from South Dakota's point is that Mother Falls, a presumed Stark fan, could somehow direct Son Falls vote. Opponents of Underwood quickly (and quite correctly according to the bylaws) that not only is there no relationship in the voting, the two electors are representing two very different states with two very different systemic setups: namely that 30 points, represented in the Winner Take All category, is mainly based on the decision of one person - based of course on the voting patterns of members of the group. In a popular sovereignty state, in this case, one worth 50 points, one voice/one vote concept applies to members of the group. The elector just functions as a person who submits those votes, and therefore is a figurehead who is the weakest of the elector types. The suggestion that Falls influences Falls is absurd, and implies that corruption would be at the highest level, to such an extent that Son Falls would not report accurately to get his mother's candidate in office.
Supporters of Underwood don't go beyond the point values represented if corruption did go this deep. Eighty points would break the election right open.
What is most interesting, however, is that both Snow and Underwood are practically neighbors, though crossing state boundaries, and both are avid Aang supporters in a region of avid Aang supporters. Add to this, that Aang has no elector representation in the Sophomore class board. Could this be an intellectual move to discredit Stark? Impeachment of two supposed Stark supporters (note: no one really knows the vote that will take place in a week's time, so this is all ungrounded speculation) might mean Aang would rise to the surface.
To add irony to irony, the only unscathed candidates are the Wayne campaign (also with no representation in the elector pool) and the Oscar the Grouch campaign, both the most silent of the candidate pool, both without platforms officially posted, and both with the need to pick up ground. These scandals, true or false, might be what both need to take the race.
10/25/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Chicago Daily
Associated Press
Independent Survey Inc. conducted the most comprehensive survey to date regarding the leading candidates and are already mapping out a prediction map. "Though there is no definitive winner," according to pollster Johnathan Peu, "leaders are emerging" when one analyzes the demographic data. "More revealing," though, Peu continues, is that the concept that the "losers would fall by the wayside" as predicted by the political pundits early in the campaigning, was debunked. Translation: there is no underdog. Each campaign has a significant spread of the vote, a particular group that gravitates towards them. This race may very well be the type in which a photofinish is necessary and the final moments, the reactions, the speeches, the bustours, the handshakes and the babyholdings are what will make or break a victory.
Peu reasserts his position though, that this Anything Goes style race does not mean that predictions are impossible. Early analysis of the polls suggests that the leading candidates are in the Stark and Big Bird camps, with each pulling in equally strong demographics. With the exception of the Wayne campaign, which could be called the dark horse candidate by some, all campaigns have presented their platforms, or (as in the case of Oscar the Grouch) have had extensive people to people / door to door meet and greets.
When dissecting the supporters, the projected leaders are winning the broader support, in part because of their successful ad campaigns and endorsements (Big Bird) and their successful deflecting of preconceived negative press (Stark). What really comes of the stats, however, is the information that campaigns can gather from their projected supporters while vetting their VP running mates.
Here's the breakdown.
Age division: AARP voters - a general support for the Wayne and Courage camps with a luke warm reception for the Big Bird campaign; 45s-65s - a dramatic lead for Big Bird, but a strong showing for Aang, especially if the age group is white collar, and a very close third for Stark; 30-45s - even split between Stark and Aang, a general distrust for both Courage and Oscar; the 24s to 30s (i.e. the fresh out of college and fresh into the workforce - or fresh into the basements of parents, perhaps) have a "religious following" of Oscar the Grouch, as do the first time voters of 18-24s. Stats show that there is a tie for distant second with Big Bird and Courage. Wayne makes a respectable showing with the 20 somethings.
Minorities: Most data is inconclusive, however, Peu maintains that Stark leads the Hispanic support, warning, though that the concept that ethnic groups vote as blocks can no longer be assumed. Ethnic neighborhoods in the larger urban areas may very well vote in blocks. If this is so, Chicago and New York seem to favor the dark horse Wayne. West Coast centers, on the other hand support the the Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch campaigns, perhaps because of their urban roots on the street. Rural voters gravitate towards the logic of Aang more than others, though Courage is a close second and can easily take the lead, says pundits.
Gender divisions are even more foggy, and more research is needed in the area, including the subdivisions of professional female / professional male, as well as age divisions based on gender. This may be an interesting statement on the idea that gender roles in 2012 are very different from that in prior elections. Civil Rights leaders state that the contoversial issues, especially ones dealing with marriage laws and issues of abortion haven't been mapped out by the candidates, and these issues, traditionally seen as gender issues, are to obscured for voters to really decide. The elephant in the room though is the incredible absence of a female candidate. This leaves many to wonder: Who will be brave enough to find a running mate who will pull in the female vote through the announcement of a female running mate?
The clarity of the stats is most evident in the geographic divisions, and perhaps the most significant information for each campaign. In a general sense, New Englanders favor the Courage and the Aang camps, with a strong following for Big Bird; MidAtlantic voters, though not as clear, tend to follow the developments in the Stark, Wayne and Oscar campaigns. Many suggest that there is no true image division between the Stark and Wayne campaigns and both need to do a better job in finding unique differences that would sway the vote. Other campaigns, however, might prefer that blurry division, because the ambiguity very well might split the vote enough to keep either candidate from taking office. Southerners are all out Wayne fans, almost to the state. Ironically, the difficulty that MidAtlantic voters have in finding differences in the Wayne / Stark camps, is not evident with Southerns. Wayne, seen as a traditionalist by many far outmaneuvers the often glossy newness of tech giant Tony Stark, seen in Dixieland as too confident for his own good. Florida however, split their support for Big Bird and Oscar, as does California. These point toting states may very well prove to be the ones that win the election. Pundits even suggest that if a deal can be made between the Sesame Street pals, the victory can be in the bag. Which candidate should bow down to the next is a question of how the supporters will take the shift to the second in command. Midlanders from Oklahoma to the Dakotas are fullhearted Aang fans; Courage takes a definite second place, one that has a supporters calling for the teaming up of the two. This deal, no doubt would disappoint Ohio fans, however, as the roles are reversed. The campaigns cannot afford to lose this very important state. Southwestern voters are Stark fans, with Wayne a possible alternative, but nowhere close to even being a meaningful challenge in Texas or Arizona. The foggiest vote is in the Pacific Northwest where there are respectful showings for all but the Wayne camp. Hawaii and Alaska, although not big point getters favor the Stark and Aang straightforwardness.
As varied as these results are, there is nothing straightforward about the campaigns, and if there is any agreement in the political world, it is that the Vice Presidential selection will turn the tide for voters. If not this, then the campaign headquarters may start thinking about the power of political coalitions, and the deals that can be cut such as an endorsement for cabinet position bargaining chip for those who refuse to fall by the proverbial wayside.
10/24/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Rolling Stone
Finally the face of grunge has a candidate. Garage band artists of the 1990s, move over for garbage band artiste Oscar the Grouch (OTG in textspeak) of the 20teens. The four years of leadership that will steer this country in the direction it needs is green, is ugged up, and is as real as they get. Rolling Stone has prided itself on the real side of the music scene and has religiously steered clear of the political arena in favour of the concert venues where great acts have made a name for themselves. Today Rolling Stone is breaking that tradition, because we here have also had a tradition of knowing swag when we see it. (Tony Stark's the only one who even approaches the SWAG meter....see: Rolling Stone banner hyperlinked at bottom)
But here it is:
RUReddy?
OMG:OTG's
got SWAG.
There the cat's out of the bag, the monsters out of the garbage can. The following of the young adult vote has Bieber trembling in his soprano vocals, has Twilight turning to dark nothingness, and has the popularity of the latest syles turning to grunge 2012.
What is the attraction to this less than polite permanent bad hair day grouch; why do the youth flock to his presentations as they did amidst the cool October air of St. Louis only two nights back, with Jennifer Lopez, and a whole string of surprise guest celebrating into the wee hours of the morning as OTG fever had come to a climax. The feel of the city was alive, was oddly, as if there was a victory already won. This party is the Saintly city has positivity reign supreme, ironically, from the candidate that is often thought of as the most somber, and perhaps the most irritable of the line of Presidential hopefuls.
What gave OTG the facelift he needed was, in fact, the company he kept. A line of superstars came in support, and the parks of the city came alive with music.
Music, in fact, seemed to liven up the crowd, and music, in fact, is exactly the feel good campaign of the century, as if OTG kept politics out of the political campaign. This formula worked miracles and already the 18-24 demographically are promising their ballots come November 6th. Somehow, OTG found his groove, and it struck chords with the upandcomings.
Rolling Stone was there to record the incredible night and as photo after photo was taken, after song after song was sung, no one seemed to ask, what attracted the musicians to support this grouch complainer. If such a question mattered, it certainly didn't seem so to the newly enfranchised who with the body passes and the chopping of the air just felt thankful that finally a candidate had a good playlist. See pics in the latest Rolling Stone at:
http://demott.weebly.com/world-lit-11.html
10/23/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
New York Herald Tribune
Welcome to the 1920s
OpEd
Just reading the platform of the progressive candidate Aang the Avatar makes the most certain and steadfast of voters, well, dubious, at best. Filled with well meaning trite-isms, the platform is, well, without form. Aang jumps on the "let's reduce our foreign oil dependency" bandwagon and touts a new world of alternative energy as if windmills and solar panels were stocking stuffers on St. Nicks Days and the lumps of coal were left for the naughty boys and girls of America. Well, Aang's campaign no doubt will have to explain why Santa's two lists somehow got mixed up....and how Canada (the United States friendliest neighbor, eh?) which is filled with untapped resources and shares the world's largest amiable political boundary - stretching upwards of 3000 miles....how beloved Canada somehow got into the same sentence as South American oilmongers (translated as Venezuela and the sulphur smelling Chavez) is beyond any American loving patriot.
Scientist are certain that there are cleaner energies in our future. No one is certain as to who will pay for the development of these energies. Certainly Aang, or any of his compatriot candidates - who frankly are hiding behind the potential media fallout of the first platform offering of all the Presidential hopefuls, does not make anything more than a passing mention of monetary concerns. Suffice it to say we know Aang is concerned. This is as good as furrowing your brow in displeasure. It feels good to have someone on your side, until, well, until a solution is needed. I won't bore voters with the reality of facts and logic and the like...rather I'll let our correspondents in Minnesota do that in their scathing look at the reality of energy independence. Take ten minutes to peruse the following: http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/npr.php?id=163573768 and see how much sense Aang is making.
Conservatives, especially those in highly militarized communities are concerned as well, and I'm sure there is a whole lot of brow furrowing going on in the Colorado Springs, Anapolisis, and Fort Braggs around our nation. In the platform published at http://demott.weebly.com/platforms.html one can read phrases which call the military a "political puppet", and states in no uncertain terms that the US is not obliged to serve as a "global police force" calling for a reduction of US military prescence around the world, as budgets are examined to prevent the "syphoning" of funds. Let's rephrase these patriotic words as a general attitude that the economic crisis existing today is the fault of a budgetary loophole - i.e. the military, the very men and women who throw their lives in harms way to protect the very values hold as self evident. The values, however, of the military, according to the Aang team is that this great nation is nothing but the creator of "conflict" and "destruction". An interesting choice of words from a candidate who spends most of his time OUT of the country he proposes to lead. I remind the dear reading public that all of this is in black and white on the platform page and comes directly from the Aang campaign team.
So I urge the dear voters to vote for this extraordinary candidate. Cast your ballot for someone who wishes to return the US to the isolationalism that was the 1920s. Enjoy the quickstep of the Charleston and the flash of knee that the flappers may show off, but also don't forget that this was the decade that led to the Great Depression and ten years later the most destructive war in human history.
Now before you turn away from the ballot box, I urge you to read the other candidate's platforms, which as of today, have yet to go to press. So alongside the manifesto that is dubious at best from the Aang campaign team, there is a lot of empty dead space, and the irony is, as I type this, I still wonder, is it better to vote for the destruction that is known or that which is unknown and unpublished?
10/22/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Houston Herald
It's Official. The Sensational Six will go head to head to head to head to head to head! Candidates officially announce their run for President.
First on the A list: (Candidate A)The Bruce Wayne campaign invites the public to an opening ceremony at the Washington Monument to official announce his candidacy. Amongst others expected to attend include Ben Affleck, Tom Hanks, and Celine Dion.
Meanwhile, Aang (Candidate B), the Last Airbender star, is projected to officially announce the candidacy for the highest office on a H'Oprah Special one hour production, along with talk show superstar Oprah Winfrey.
Oscar the Grouch (Candidate C), on the other hand, teams up with Jenny from the Block (music icon Jennifer Lopez) to announce his run in St. Louis Central, alongside the good people of America.
Tony Stark's (Candidate D) official run begins as well. In Stark fashion, viewers should watch the airwaves as television commercials will run continuously until the November 6th election.
Courage, the Cowardly Dog (Candidate E), plans to do a take it to the streets campaign, in which representatives hit the door to door market in fifty metropolitian areas, to say vote for the Underdog.
Candidate Big Bird's (Candidate F) campaign is also launched today, mainly in a statement made by his campaign representatives.
All the platforms, commercials, and campaign material can be found on individual campaign pages, as well as the individual banners on www.demott.weebly.com .
10/21/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Hollywood Today!
Hollywood has its faceoff. Tony and Bruce, filled with Hollywood Juice. A short stroll through the pictorial history of both Stark and Wayne shows that they both know how to accessorize. Blonde for Tony? Brunette for Bruce? Well, the answer to this delicious dilema is revealed only depending how many scrapbook pages back you turn. No doubt this precious gents phone lists would be national best sellers - from supermodels to high school crushes ... but what does this say for the ability to lead the free world? Gender equality no doubt will take a back seat to these two's gender whims. Just a look at the employment staffing of both entrepreneurs reveals something very very traditional....the glass ceiling for the female manager is quite low, and no, count them, no females advance into the upper circle of power so coveted in both supranational organizations. Is this what the world needs - a step back into 1950s sensibilities?
Outside these playboys, America is introduced to the players of Sesame Street, both with fanbases of their own, both with a big yellow (or green) question mark as to the serious nature of their campaigns. Although the following is great, do we not need to ask, is this just another Children's Crusade....if so, let's not forget what happened in the last Children's Crusade. Do we want such leadership?
The third face off, if you can call it that , is an almost faceless faceoff. The no names of the campaign. Can we afford the mystery? The shadows of a Curious Who? Aang Who? Which one is that? Is that how we want our international image to be perceived? If so, I might suggest a simple close your eyes and pick tactic. I've plenty of phone books I can loan you at the voter booth.
10/20/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Independent Poll Shows Cloudy Future
Associated Press
Results from a weeklong poll from POLLSTAR, a DC based survey and marketing company with no political affiliations, shows a luke warm reception to the candidates. Having polled nearly 1,000 respondants in the greater DC area, POLLSTAR officials state that "there is no clear winner; and no clear loser. Depending on the question, different candidates come out on top, and others sink to the bottom." Officials would like to remind the public that the poll was for preassessment only, and have no real outcome on actual voting.
A full analysis of this weeks report can be found on their website. A summary review is below. The numbers by the side of each candidate is the percentage of people who felt the candidate would be stronger than or as strong as the competition.
Foreign policy: B. Wayne (52); Aang (43); Oscar the Grouch (15); Tony Stark (74); Curious (16); Big Bird (46)
Economic policy: B. Wayne (75); Aang (21); Oscar the Grouch (21); Tony Stark (71); Curious (24); Big Bird (31)
Education policy: B. Wayne (21); Aang (25); Oscar the Grouch (42); Tony Stark (30); Curious (36); Big Bird (68)
Gender Equality: B. Wayne (18); Aang (43); Oscar the Grouch (48); Tony Stark (9); Curious (69); Big Bird (71)
Religious Values: B. Wayne (25); Aang (32); Oscar the Grouch (22); Tony Stark (16); Curious (44); Big Bird (53)
Job Creation: B. Wayne (75); Aang (22); Oscar the Grouch (11); Tony Stark (78); Curious (36); Big Bird (31)
Upholding 2nd Amendment: B. Wayne (86); Aang (42); Oscar the Grouch (35); Tony Stark (97); Curious (37); Big Bird (22)
Social Programs: B. Wayne (35); Aang (39); Oscar the Grouch (36); Tony Stark (37); Curious (68); Big Bird (42)
Environment: B. Wayne (42); Aang (68); Oscar the Grouch (10); Tony Stark (40); Curious (66); Big Bird (62)
Arts: B. Wayne (11); Aang (35); Oscar the Grouch (20); Tony Stark (44); Curious (75); Big Bird (74)
10/19/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Presidentially Pool Dubious, Says Political Junkie Henry O'Hara
OpEd
Today the intention to run for the highest office in the land by 6 candidates leaves, well, a sour taste in the mouth. On Monday of this upcoming week the expectation is that the ballot box will include the likes of two upper class playboys (Gothem City's Bruce Wayne and the "iron" hero of warmonger Tony Stark), one firey ball of negativity, the bull moose Oscar "the Grouch", two no-names in Curious and Aang, both who make us wonder if we might get the write in candidate to get more votes, and one idealistic big yellow optimist who will smile his way into a happy song, as our enemies will push him this way and that.
Given this pool, I might consider applying for my passport and looking for work in some of the American companies already overseas.
What is interesting is how each will approach the issues of today. I, for one, will be glued to my tv as the ads come through and the platforms become public....
NBC
11/4/2012
Investigation Continues
What has police departments around the nation asking questions to the Department of Justice's investigation on Tony Stark's near death experience is the incredible lack of evidence. No leads, no bullet, no witnesses, not even a viable interview leaves officers such as Brandon Larkson or Indianapolis asking: did it really happen? In a Politics around the nation interview on NBC's Sunday morning, Larkson, alongside three other officers from different regions, were asked who will they give their support to"I'm a pragmatist. If there's no evidence, there's no crime." When asked what to make of this, the discussion round tabled to finish with a concensus view from the four guests that (in the words of Officer Mandy Wright (Oklahoma) "Stark took a Stark bullet from a Stark gun with a Stark shooter, probably from a Stark campaign official, so that the nation can give Stark support." Felix Wilson (California) agreed, citing the poll numbers immediate spike, and the interesting parallel the incident had to Courage's abrupt hospitalization.
ABC
Two Types, One Choice
Political Junkie and ABC Political Roundtable host, Justine Oliver gives her views on the teams now running for President. In a discussion with call ins, Oliver made a major distinction between two "camps of candidates" - those who are Issues Candidates, and those who are Character Candidates.
In the first camp, Oliver brings out the Aang-Courage team's leadership on setting policy regarding expenditure. "All may not agree with the math or the allocations," said Oliver, "but all should note that the plan is comprehensive and logical." Oliver seemed to dismiss the commentary on the character attack on the military, stating that Aang, while making the comments, was speaking from an economic lens. "War costs money, there's no way around it; it just makes sense, in fact, it just makes dollars and cents, that cutting back on warmongering will increase the nation's coffers, especially since most of the wars are not wars of conquest or resource enrichment."
The Big Bird-Blossom team also falls in the issues camp, according to Oliver, and citing what is now called the LaRoue "near endorsement," echoed the idea that the platform is laid out for all the world to see. The no platform platform of other candidates simply pale in comparison. Big Bird's accidental flight on a supply plane managed to get laughs from critics, but also did wonders for his campaign in terms of action. For once Big Bird got away from the microphone and interacted with the people. This move seemed to electrify the movement, in part because some have, according to Oliver, "misaligned Big Bird with Corporate Media networks." Oliver pushed away such claims with a simple statement: "forty years of working for the country in a public, non-corporate network should be enough to disprove this." Oliver did make one criticism in her comments regarding the Big Bird, when a caller from Georgia asked about the VP choice. According to Oliver, "Blossum offers nothing to the campaign, and the selection was probably based upon two factors: gender and action. The first seems nominal at best; the second is a connotation, and one that doesn't match with Big Bird's own character. This VP selection, I think, is a lost opportunity for a strong candidate"
Oliver placed the Wayne-Franco, OTG-Prince, and Stark-Rogers campaign in the Character camp. "All three are running on star power and supposed values. The question is not what will these candidates do if elected President, but rather what will they stand for." The first team, although filled with compassion at the heart of Sandy, with Wayne machinery working through the night, seems, in Oliver's word choice, "staged." This concept is repeated throughout the campaign in the use of photoOps as a campaign technique and an attack on Big Bird's campaign by a catchy "Big Bird? Big Mistake" tagline being the only commercial to go national. The iconic pictures that will come from this campaign no doubt will fill many a teenage bedroom wall, but the fact that silence on anything issue orientated is a campaign strategy have many asking "how mysterious do we want our President to be?" Oliver's final commentary on the Wayne-Franco campaign was in response to the Georgia caller's VP question, where Oliver called Franco "Junior" and the partnership as an "obvious attempt to create another Wayne for the next generation." Her political read was that the campaign "might as well be called the Wayne-Wayne campaign"
Oliver did not hold back with the OTG commentary in her third segment, stating that the "five minutes" she allotted for commentary on the candidate was "more substance" than the entirety of the Grouch Campaign had to offer. The almost "laughable non-commitment" to anything Presidential makes her wonder why there are still supporters for the OTG-Prince campaign. Then, straying from her normal political pundancy, Oliver feigns mock enlightenment in saying: lol, OMG it's OTG and the text generation, admitting, albeit humoursly, that Oscar must simply speak a different language and very well might be the choice for the new generation, then in sardonic reversal. "Unfortunately, alongside their Bieber loyalty, most of his supporters can't vote yet. "
Saving her final comments for what some are seeing as her own "near endorsement," Oliver stated that perhaps the best Character candidate, in fact Character team of candidates, is the Stark-Rogers partnership. "Although clouded in controversy, as is Stark's fashion, both are seen as can-do candidates; both are seen as equals, rather than a quick political add on; both are seen as straightforward and truthful; both are seen as all American." When a caller from Oregon questioned this final claim, noting the alleged sale of arms to both sides of a war in the 1990s, making Stark the billionaire that he is today, Oliver waved her hand aside, stating that "if every unproven report on Stark were true, he'd at least make an interesting story. " Then turning serious for a moment, echoed the statement made by Stark earlier in the year that: "if looking at the record of a company, look at the company record, look at those in charge, look at those who answer to whom, and treat the company as a company. You will find that those people no longer work for Stark enterprises. If looking at a record of a person, look then at the heart of the person, and what that person has done for God and country. I'll let the archives of history be my witness"
And so, Issues vs. Character seem to be the two main candidate camps in this year's elections.
11/4/2012
Aang commissions Presidential portrait
What does supporting the arts and the President of the US have in common? Well, if Aang is elected, apparently a lot. Given the fact that this campaign, now down to five strong candidates, has never seen a clear leader, Aang decided to go to SoHo this weekend to find the artist who will make history. Backed by supporter dollars, Aang spent his afternoon on a photoshoot where artistic hopefuls sought his commission money, and their place in the art history books to be the one to be accredited to either his Presidential portrait or his Runner up portrait. Tuesday's results will tell which one this portrait will become. Those wishing to see the artwork produced during this session, both the actual portrait and the photos leading up to it can find a calendar of art gallery showings; all ticket sales will go into a disaster relief fund run by an independent NGO.
11/4/2012
From the Big Bird Campaign Central
In reaction to Hurricane Sandy, Big Bird announced Wednesday, the creation of an outreach program for the schools in affected cities. “We created a program in which kids in schools all over the country donate school supplies to help restock the schools that were destroyed. From Maine to North Carolina we want to help the children get back in school, and consequently, regain their normal lives,” said Mr. Bird. He is also supporting a ‘pen pal’ network. He wants students to learn about the effects of Hurricane Sandy on the kids in affected states. He said, “The children will be able to support others across the country, not necessarily through money, but through words.” He plans to match up schools in different states, and have each child assigned a pen pal. This program will help kids living in destroyed neighborhoods have comfort by knowing that students in other places are thinking about them. Mr. Bird’s announcement took place a few days after the storm because he was helping his neighbors on Sesame Street clean up from the damage.
11/4/2012
From the Aang/Courage Campaign Central
Reprint from 11/1/12
EXCERPT FROM:
The Oprah Magazine
Editorial, Theresa Marie
After the VP nominations became official for each of the candidates Oprah sat with the candidates to discuss the possibility of election into office. Healthcare, education, and other policies were discussed; but the highlight of the interviews came when character, personality, and family came into question. Tony Stark, Bruce Wayne, and Aang have each come a long way from broken families. The early departure of family members and friends in their lives has gained the sympathy vote for many of Oprah’s fans. (Though many fans were probably still swooning at the thought of our two notorious ladies’ men.)
Aang’s interview in particular showed Oprah the dedication and care put into Aang’s new family: his wife Katara and his son Tenzin. The two have been admirably supporting Aang and they welcome Courage with open arms into their candidacy.
Courage’s illness left him hospitalized during the interview days, but he was not forgotten. Katara and Tenzin, in agreement with Aang that he needed their support, flew out to Hawaii to help Courage gain his strength. Courage’s condition, after hearing of the heroism shown during Hurricane Sandy by many of his beloved American brothers and sisters, seemed to lighten. The three figures sat in the hospital room, tightly clasping one another’s hands, listening to the current list of casualty names, and sent their prayers to the deceased and to the families.
Courage knew what it felt like to be on the brink of death. He knows what last regrets sounded like, he knows what strength a loving hand brings, and he knows that Aang can help. Aang, who had been working on restoring a sense normalcy to the East Coast, was on the same page. Together the two are not just working on normalcy, but on improvement. Aang gave Oprah a hint that addressing natural disaster and environmental issues ranks in the top ten “presidential improvements”, as Oprah phrased it, on his list.
“These two were the underdogs,” said Oprah, “but I think that together…They have a shot at not only winning, but at making a stronger America.”
11/3/2012
The Daily Minute
The World's Wacky One Minute News Capsule
Cheever, Ohio
Bob Austin's basement
In ironic fashion, OTG's campaign speech came to an abrupt halt when a modernday soothsayer, with bullhorn in hand, announced the end of the world the day after the elections. This surprise announcement took place after OTG played his advertisement containing the other canidates in silhouette against the backdrop of a mushroom cloud, and Oscar stating: "I'm going to clean up Washington!"
Stark's near death experience, and consequent bandaid (it's only a flesh wound) have some asking why he is extending his stay there. Perhaps to soak in the warm Philadephia rays of sun; perhaps because he needs more water? According to hospital records (and yes, apparently they do keep such records as these), Stark broke a record in calling for a nurse (presumably for the aforementioned water) seventeen times within his day long stay. I hope that's how he'll deal with terrorists on the Presidential Red phone!
Big Bird responds to Sally by reaching out. In a PSA announcement the big yellow candidate step off the tarmac to deliver his I will help you speech. Unbeknownst to the pilot of Big Bird One, however, the airstrip was reserved for a supply plane coming in minutes later. Behind the Big Bird, one can see, a quick taxi out of his own airplane and a quick landing of the supply plane. Once the speech was done, Big Bird was hurried off to his next location to give his next speech, which apparently was in all the areas that needed supplies. Big Bird took it in good fashion, stating: "I guess that I was just supposed to help deliver these supplies"
Bruce Wayne, frightened? In a campaign plug that included the Wayne - Franco team touring the Chicago zoo (presumably to show how family friendly they are, and also to sell the pictures that came from the event as a fundraiser for Sally victims), it was neither the donkey nor the elephant that got the paparazzi snapping their shutters, but the creepy and crawly. In the snake house, zookeepers had a surprise for the team, and draped them both in boa constrictors for a photo op. Two pictures, however, topped sales for this unique fundraiser. The first is Franco tenderly touching the glass that separated him from the world's largest spider. The second, in eerie green night vision, is that of Wayne visiting the nocturnal house, where zookeepers decided to surprise the presidential candidate by releasing the bats. For most, this would be a heart stopping experience. Wayne, however, hardly blinked an eye, and looked as stoic as the Mt. Rushmore faces in the Black Hills.
Aang and Courage on Oprah? In what some call a staged performance, the underdogs are now the endorsed. Oprah Winfrey, who earlier hosted Aang's presidential announcement made it official in stating that these two candidates will make a "stronger America". Almost on cue, Courage then proceeded to faint in his chair, and slide, slinky-like, to the floor, having Oprah quickly call for commercial. The hot Oprah stage lighting was determined to be the cause.
11/2/2012
Tony Stark Grazed by Bullet at Rally
Philadephia Sun
Associated Press
Investigations are underway after Presidential candidate Tony Stark had to be rushed to the hospital due to an attempt on his life in the center of historic Philadelphia. Doctors state that other than a scare, Stark's condition is remarkably good. In preparation for what some called his pre-acceptance acceptance speech, S
tark climbed the few steps of the stairs that led him to the presentation platform. Before reaching the top, he fell, in what seemed like an embarassing stumble, but when he failed to get up, aids rushed to check on him, and found his neck filled with blood. Though it all ended up being "just a scratch" with a lot of blood, Stark's life could have easily ended had the bullet found its way about an inch and a half away from where he was hit.
Police are remaining quiet about the details of the investigation and promise to give a statement once more details are known. Speculations are notfd as quiet, however. Stark as president could see more such attempts on his life, and have many asking, who would want Stark dead even before he becomes President. Will America be safer as a result if he's actual elected? This question is perhaps unanswerable. But certainly the nurses at Philadelphia Central hospital might not be safe from Stark's prowess.
Word is, Stark's survival might mean his victory. Upon first reporting, pollsters noted that Stark jumped a remarkable 12 points in the polls, a feat only accomplished by the Aang campaign teaming up with Courage, the now VP candidate who collapsed in Hawaii while campaigning.
11/1/2012
Denver Daily
Letter to the Editor
Dear Editor Thoms:
I was so happy when I turned 18 last year, not only because of the seeming freedoms that came with that "magic" age, but more importantly, because I knew I could exercise my right to vote. Ever since my grandfather took me on a road trip to our capital when I was eight, I dreamed of this moment. It seemed as if I could make a postitive contribution to this great land. So, why, I ask you, do the candidates prefer to keep the other candidates down with constant mudslinging. Whether asking for a vote from a first time voter like me, or asking for support from someone who first went to the polls to vote in the 1936 election, candidates should really attempt to win or vote instead of having us lose faith in the other candidates. I mean really, if this were any other situation, it would be ridiculous. Imagine disrespecting all the other job applicants when you are being interviewed; or winning that special someone's hand in marriage because you were better at talking trash than her other option.
So, editor, I implore you to publish only the positive and make this land the land of optimism and opportunity even in how we present ourselves.
John Gilgameshi, registered voter
10/31/2012
Anchorage Report
Associated Press
The impeachment of Ms. Taylor Jacobson from her own group members earlier this day was swift and final. Jacobson walked away from the courthouse without the position of Elector, leaving those who voted for her dismissal with 25% more voting power. The Stark campaign welcomed her home with honor and immediately sought out to investigate other questionable electors, namely that of high point bearing electors of Falls, Falls, and LaRoue, the latter having issued a very public leaning for candidate Big Bird, whose campaign office offered no comment to what is being considered a defacto endorsement.
10/31/2012
VP candidates unmasked
Elk River University Chronicle
The Ozark's Alternative News Source
The Presidential hopefuls are down to five as Courage steps down official from the running for the highest office in the land, stating that due to uncertain health problems, he simply cannot lead the country down the path of uncertainty. In his thank you speech to his supporters, he threw his entire support to the Aang Campaign. In turn Aang immediately brought Courage aboard in asking if he'd be kind enough to be the nation's number two.
Other campaigns managed to submit their picks to the Federal Election committee just in time to be accepted. Bruce Wayne chose actor, writer, scholar James Franco, perhaps to capture the younger voters and break that very traditional image of his without contradicting his values. Tony Stark also sought the young voters in turning to long time friend Steve Rogers, sometimes known for his touring as the patriotic Captain America in military presentations.
The leader in the polls, Big Bird, and the leader in the swag, OTG, both went nontraditional and selected females for their campaigns, Blossom (of Power Puff fame) for Big Bird, and Diana Prince (the Wonder Women of military intelligence fame, and former army nurse) for Oscar the Grouch have both accepted the nomination.
And as the teams are set to pit against each other: Wayne/Franco, Aang/Courage, Stark/Rogers, OTG/Prince, and Bird/Blossom, the world is set to react.
Big News Day
10/30/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Honolulu Express
Courage Calls for Support
Presidentially candidate Courage the Cowardly Dog remains hospitalized today after a collapse from exhaustion. Doctors say that he has taken a turn for the worse, and family members were calling for a priest. In and out of consciousness, Courage was observed as saying; "let them fight on...let my .... good people.... of the United.... States fight.....on from the Hills of South Dakota, to the waters of Lake Michigan, to the lowlands of California and the tundra of Fairbanks.... let them fight the good ..... cause." Campaign officials say that they appreciate the letters of support, but hope that the senders of the letters will also send a strong message to Congress that Courage will be the next President of the United States.
10/30/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
MSNBC
Conan's Surprise Guest
Arguably one of the most influential and point bearing electors, Ms. K. LaRoue, decided a trip to her favorite crazed comedian Conan O'Brien was in order to announce her "leaning" towards the Big yellow candidate. In her own words, LaRoue, when asked who she would vote for, stated: I'll be honest, based on the current information available, I'm leaning towards Big Bird!" LaRoue cited the fact that she liked the comprehensive nature of his platform and added: "Plus, the celebrity endorsements are impressive."
This near endorsement can be seen as a full fledged endorsement, especially when one considers the venue. When considering LaRoue's point value as well as the results of day one of the preliminary polls (see article below), Big Bird seems a clear leader.
In response, and perhaps also as a slight to the cowardice (often referred to as "being yellow") of Courage, the Cowardly Dog, O'Brien responded in perfect form with having his audience chant: "He ain't yellow, he's my fellow!" while holding up a card featuring a silhouette of Big Bird. "On my show we are completely unbiased as to politics, and this card in my hands represents the solemn promise we make to stay this way. This silhouette is ambigious enough to represent anyone of our candidates." In stark contrast of his quibbings, the card showed the eight foot bird next to the petit forms of average man.
Conan, in his own way, joined leagues with LaRoue and the multitude of celebrity endorsements that give candidates the tidal wave they need to win a major victory.
10/30/2012
Day One Preliminary Poll Results
Only four questions are asked in the preliminary poll, but the two most intriquing are the first two, namely who would you vote for and who wouldn't you vote for. In both categories there are definite leads.
As of midnight, the results are thus.
For the first question: who would you vote for: Big Bird has a 20 point spread on the triple tie for second (Aang, Courage, and Oscar) In a distant third, also in a three way tie are Wayne, Stark and "Not Sure", leaving the two playboys not much to play with.
The second question: who would you NOT vote for: Wayne takes a decisive lead, doubling the percentages against second placers Tony Stark (and the surprise entry) Big Bird, showing that the populist candidate isn't popular amongst all demographics. An equal percentage falls in the "Not Sure" category. Out of the fire with no votes in this category are Aang, Courage and Oscar.
The other two questions relate to issues and character traits, and responses vary greatly in the first category, but are fairly consistent in the second, with the same concept being submitted by polltakers in various forms.
In the issues question, the top response was education, however, the environment, foreign policy, social issues and ensuring equality for all made strong showings for what respondants are concerned about.
In reference to the final question regarding desirable presidential character traits, respondants felt that a President should be honest, have integrity, and be principled. The only variation is that the President should be fiscally responsible, which could easily be taken as an economic form of honesty and with integrity.
Candidates should be careful of taking this poll as a true barometer as all pundits will tell you, day one of polling is often less than representative because less people vote early on and the true test is shown as the poll continues. Preliminary polling will remain open until November 4th. Actual voting is scheduled for electors only on November 5th / 6th.
10/30/2012
The Dark Horse Becomes the Dark Knight
EXCERPT FROM:
Forbes Magazine
Bruce Wayne was never one to waste time; this concept in fact is a tradition in his long ancestral commerce genes. Some may say that campaigning for the highest office in the nation seemed a bit of a waste of time for him; as of late, Wayne had hardly even remembered that he was running for President and offered not a peep to the 250 million or so eligible voters, after all the business decisions during the day and social gatherings during the night, the man needs his beauty sleep. Bruce Wayne, for some, was been a name synonymous with inaction. After all, his stocks do all his work for him...and much of those were, afterall part of his inheritance. What does he do with all that time? Couldn't he, say, present a platform, give a speech, kiss a baby...do something, well, a bit like a Presidential candidate would.
Yet his beloved Gotham loves him; the strong silent type who just happens to have his own butler and mansion and money to burn. The South too loves him, and the deeper the south, the deeper the love.
To be fair, those who don't love him generally don't hate him; they just don't know him, leaving him and what he does with all that money a secret to the average Joe Lunchbox. Unlike his competition, who have to perform degrading acts of fundraising for their campaigns, all of Wayne's costs are out of pocket, and therefore, as a private investment, not necessary to share with the public.
Yet, this secrecy, this almost hidden second Wayne has eyebrows raising as Wayne hit the news like a storm....like a perfect storm called Sandy. The dark horse turned a dark knight. When citizens affected by this week's horrific hurricane asked the candidates, "what are you going to do?" Wayne did not answer with words; rather with action. To date, no other candidate issued statements. Wayne Enterprise boats, staffed by not only lower ranking employees and senior officials, but by Wayne himself, patrolled the waters of the Hudson, ferrying (according to some reports) over one hundred citizens of the coast to the safety of a shelter. Meanwhile the buzz of helicopters could be heard above as attic rescues were taking place in waterlogged neighborhoods where local officials could not traverse.
Such was the ninja like response of Wayne, that the compassionate Wayne, the empathetic Wayne, the Wayne of the People shown in the darkness of Sandy's cloudcover and torrential rains, and he stood, suitcoat flapping in the wind like a superheroes cape, barking out orders to save those in harms way.
Now only hours old, the night is an almost legendary one, one that includes iconic pictures virally racing through the virtual world. The secrecy remains; however, but it is a secrecy with purpose, resulting in a very new Bruce Wayne reigning supreme.
Strange to say, with hindsight, or with blindsight, it almost seems a relief to see what a candidate will do as in the heroic action displayed by Wayne, rather than hear what he promises to do, like the two score and three presidents before. If one does wish to read his platforms and see his newest advertisements, this too is possible, as the official release from his campaign office went out this morning, leaving the presumptive leaders of the race in a very precarious positions.
10/29/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Yahoo News:
Courage hospitalized for exhaustion.
After running like a dog through a record fifteen states in fifteen days, Courage tirelessly gave tarmac speech after tarmac speech, gathering huge crowds to his "this underdog needs your vote" speech. After a whirlwind tour of Hawaii on Saturday, the candidate collapsed midspeech. Doctors say that exhaustion is the cause and ordered a day rest for the candidate. He is now spending the day in Honolulu taking in liquids and being serviced by the very health care system he proposes to change for the better. His campaign office states that the one day rest will not slow him down, and all scheduled speeches will continue in Milwaukee, Ann Arbor, Indianapolis, Louisville, Colombus, and Wheeling. For those in Tacoma, Boise, and Salt Lake City, Courage is already working on the livefeed speeches to his supporters via webcam from the beach, where he is expected to thank them for standing out in the rain waiting for his plane to land, while he was hospitalized. Courage is to be certain to have an umbrella in his drink to show symbolic unity with those who had umbrellas while waiting for his arrival. Cleverly, Courage is making the best of the situation and turing this misfortune into a campaign slogan, saying "hey voters, I got you covered!"
10/28/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Hannibal Digest:
Hurricane Sandy victims ask candidates what they are going to do as President regarding natural disaster preparation. Georgette Stephenson who had the misfortune of moving from Hurricane Katrina flooded Mississippi to the area most likely to be hit the hardest this Tuesday, said it plainly: "Whoever wins this election will be paying for my repair, so I ask what are you going to do?" Oliver Ungst, of New York echoed this sentiment, and added: "we can't stop mother nature, but we can institute policies that can make the hardship less hard, and start building infrastructures that will prevent some of this hardship."
10/27/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
The Gomez Report: WEBH, Boston
Editorial, Marcus Gomez
VEEPS ready to jump in.
The world awaits the announcement on the number two position in American politics. No candidate has given their decisions as of yet, though a Wednesday deadline is approaching fast.
Therefore, here are my simple suggestions on how each candidate should select their Vice President, from yours truly, Marcus Gomez.
After doing this radio broadcast for the past fifteen years,and after having interviewed many important people on many important topics. I think I know a thing or two about politics, business, education and the like, my first suggestion for all the candidates is to select me. Why not? a man of the people, a huge fan base, representing diversity and charm, and a heck of a good looking guy to boot...I look great in Hugo Boss, if your buying and even better in a Presidential limo. Call me at the station, and I'll tell you where to send it.
I know I'll have to beat the offers off with a stick, so I'll also suggest a couple of other thoughts on the matter.
Bruce Wayne - someone a little less mysterious, someone a bit more with the people, someone who can take a region with their personality. Maybe female, though the traditional pull of male authority might actually be a larger gain from Wayne. If going for New England, female would be acceptable, maybe even seen as a major positive in segregating the Wayne - Stark similarities in many voters eyes. If going for the rural midwest, female would be a liability, not so much because of the gender, but because it would be seen as a political move on Wayne's part.
Aang - Aang has the middle; now he needs to go coastal. A conservative approach would be to gain points in the disputed east coast where there's no clear leader. A bold approach would be to try to take California and / or Florida. Whether successful or not, this may be seen as a move in the right direction and gain points in states not even thought about. Also, as far as direction is concerned, Aang needs to look ahead 50 years and ask what it is that the nation will want then in a Presidential candidate. That should be his VP.
Oscar the Grouch- OTG has the toughest position in VP selection, namely because he is running on RedBull power and the swag meter is way up. He cannot go too different, therefore reducing his own swag; he cannot go too similar, therefore not taking advantage of the concept of selecting someone that supplements his weakness. He therefore has to go for someone of equal swag value, but in a region where he is sitting in a comfortable second place. He definitely should not attempt a bold move that will attempt to gain the voters who are against him. He'll never get their votes and any attempt would be a simple waste of time.
Tony Stark - Stark needs to be himself. Pick from the heart. Don't worry about anyone's opinions because as soon as he starts taking political orders or makes political moves, he will cease being Tony Stark.
Courage the Cowardly Dog - I never thought I'd say this, because it seems like a cop out, but here is the rare occassion where one candidate asking another candidate for assistance might just be the winning combination. A Courage-Aang 2012 campaign might just take it. (Incidentally so might an Aang-Courage 2012). Both are complementary enough and different enough to make it happen. I just don't want to be around during the coin toss that decides who leads whom.
Big Bird-If anyone can pull off an unorthodox VEEP, it's Big Bird. Whether female, or ethnic, or regionally underrepresented, Big Birds keep it clean campaigning gives a real sense of genuinity. Here's another rare suggestion from Gomez (pick me, pick me, pick me): do not go traditional, do not look at the map, do not count points. Simply be genuine, and in the process, stay away from Oscar. He's a good guy, he lives in a garbage can, he's got a lot to say, but he's not you Big Bird. Maybe a Ronald McDonald, or maybe Blue - or Blue's Clues fame...combine the two of you...and you'll get Oscar and the rest green with envy.
10/26/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Washington Times
Associated Press
Congress calls for a comprehensive election investigation as things tighten up in the preseidential race. This latest action comes mainly from two Senators: Patricia Snow from Nebraska, and Randolph Underwood from South Dakota. Both point to election fraud regarding electors Jacobson and the Falls family. In the first case, Snow highlights a recent radio promo commissioned by Jacobson which directly stated:
As all of the campaigners shape up in to able candidates, I see those who seemed to be the underdogs grow into strong competitors. This is turning into quite a tight race. Anthony Stark for President.
The endorsement is seen as a violation of conflict of interests regulations in the elector bylaws. As Snow, a federal senator, can make complaint and / or call for an investigation, the issue is to be ultimately resolved from the deparmental level, meaning the authority to enforce the rules is up to the members of the group. Should the other electors select to oust Jacobson from the electors circle, their own point values will go up. Should they select to keep Jacobson in, they very well might be allowing in a political point for Stark, who is at this point viewed as a frontrunner. Political considerations for the decision are not clear cut because, among other things, other voters may view whichever decision is made as a political move...and all the electors from this camp are also officials for their particular candidates, meaning that what seemed an advantage early on (i.e. political voice for the campaigners) now may bring the overall acceptance of these candidates down.
In the case of the Falls, i.e. Gisele Falls, elector representing a Winner Take All 30 points, and Greg Falls, elector representing a Popular Sovereignty 50 points, there is a different federal approach to the issue. Underwood, who begins the investigation this Tuesday, has a weak case, according to not only political pundits, but also his colleagues in Congress. In a statement made last Friday, Underwood questioned how the mother and son relationship between the two electors might influence the voting. The senator from South Dakota's point is that Mother Falls, a presumed Stark fan, could somehow direct Son Falls vote. Opponents of Underwood quickly (and quite correctly according to the bylaws) that not only is there no relationship in the voting, the two electors are representing two very different states with two very different systemic setups: namely that 30 points, represented in the Winner Take All category, is mainly based on the decision of one person - based of course on the voting patterns of members of the group. In a popular sovereignty state, in this case, one worth 50 points, one voice/one vote concept applies to members of the group. The elector just functions as a person who submits those votes, and therefore is a figurehead who is the weakest of the elector types. The suggestion that Falls influences Falls is absurd, and implies that corruption would be at the highest level, to such an extent that Son Falls would not report accurately to get his mother's candidate in office.
Supporters of Underwood don't go beyond the point values represented if corruption did go this deep. Eighty points would break the election right open.
What is most interesting, however, is that both Snow and Underwood are practically neighbors, though crossing state boundaries, and both are avid Aang supporters in a region of avid Aang supporters. Add to this, that Aang has no elector representation in the Sophomore class board. Could this be an intellectual move to discredit Stark? Impeachment of two supposed Stark supporters (note: no one really knows the vote that will take place in a week's time, so this is all ungrounded speculation) might mean Aang would rise to the surface.
To add irony to irony, the only unscathed candidates are the Wayne campaign (also with no representation in the elector pool) and the Oscar the Grouch campaign, both the most silent of the candidate pool, both without platforms officially posted, and both with the need to pick up ground. These scandals, true or false, might be what both need to take the race.
10/25/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Chicago Daily
Associated Press
Independent Survey Inc. conducted the most comprehensive survey to date regarding the leading candidates and are already mapping out a prediction map. "Though there is no definitive winner," according to pollster Johnathan Peu, "leaders are emerging" when one analyzes the demographic data. "More revealing," though, Peu continues, is that the concept that the "losers would fall by the wayside" as predicted by the political pundits early in the campaigning, was debunked. Translation: there is no underdog. Each campaign has a significant spread of the vote, a particular group that gravitates towards them. This race may very well be the type in which a photofinish is necessary and the final moments, the reactions, the speeches, the bustours, the handshakes and the babyholdings are what will make or break a victory.
Peu reasserts his position though, that this Anything Goes style race does not mean that predictions are impossible. Early analysis of the polls suggests that the leading candidates are in the Stark and Big Bird camps, with each pulling in equally strong demographics. With the exception of the Wayne campaign, which could be called the dark horse candidate by some, all campaigns have presented their platforms, or (as in the case of Oscar the Grouch) have had extensive people to people / door to door meet and greets.
When dissecting the supporters, the projected leaders are winning the broader support, in part because of their successful ad campaigns and endorsements (Big Bird) and their successful deflecting of preconceived negative press (Stark). What really comes of the stats, however, is the information that campaigns can gather from their projected supporters while vetting their VP running mates.
Here's the breakdown.
Age division: AARP voters - a general support for the Wayne and Courage camps with a luke warm reception for the Big Bird campaign; 45s-65s - a dramatic lead for Big Bird, but a strong showing for Aang, especially if the age group is white collar, and a very close third for Stark; 30-45s - even split between Stark and Aang, a general distrust for both Courage and Oscar; the 24s to 30s (i.e. the fresh out of college and fresh into the workforce - or fresh into the basements of parents, perhaps) have a "religious following" of Oscar the Grouch, as do the first time voters of 18-24s. Stats show that there is a tie for distant second with Big Bird and Courage. Wayne makes a respectable showing with the 20 somethings.
Minorities: Most data is inconclusive, however, Peu maintains that Stark leads the Hispanic support, warning, though that the concept that ethnic groups vote as blocks can no longer be assumed. Ethnic neighborhoods in the larger urban areas may very well vote in blocks. If this is so, Chicago and New York seem to favor the dark horse Wayne. West Coast centers, on the other hand support the the Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch campaigns, perhaps because of their urban roots on the street. Rural voters gravitate towards the logic of Aang more than others, though Courage is a close second and can easily take the lead, says pundits.
Gender divisions are even more foggy, and more research is needed in the area, including the subdivisions of professional female / professional male, as well as age divisions based on gender. This may be an interesting statement on the idea that gender roles in 2012 are very different from that in prior elections. Civil Rights leaders state that the contoversial issues, especially ones dealing with marriage laws and issues of abortion haven't been mapped out by the candidates, and these issues, traditionally seen as gender issues, are to obscured for voters to really decide. The elephant in the room though is the incredible absence of a female candidate. This leaves many to wonder: Who will be brave enough to find a running mate who will pull in the female vote through the announcement of a female running mate?
The clarity of the stats is most evident in the geographic divisions, and perhaps the most significant information for each campaign. In a general sense, New Englanders favor the Courage and the Aang camps, with a strong following for Big Bird; MidAtlantic voters, though not as clear, tend to follow the developments in the Stark, Wayne and Oscar campaigns. Many suggest that there is no true image division between the Stark and Wayne campaigns and both need to do a better job in finding unique differences that would sway the vote. Other campaigns, however, might prefer that blurry division, because the ambiguity very well might split the vote enough to keep either candidate from taking office. Southerners are all out Wayne fans, almost to the state. Ironically, the difficulty that MidAtlantic voters have in finding differences in the Wayne / Stark camps, is not evident with Southerns. Wayne, seen as a traditionalist by many far outmaneuvers the often glossy newness of tech giant Tony Stark, seen in Dixieland as too confident for his own good. Florida however, split their support for Big Bird and Oscar, as does California. These point toting states may very well prove to be the ones that win the election. Pundits even suggest that if a deal can be made between the Sesame Street pals, the victory can be in the bag. Which candidate should bow down to the next is a question of how the supporters will take the shift to the second in command. Midlanders from Oklahoma to the Dakotas are fullhearted Aang fans; Courage takes a definite second place, one that has a supporters calling for the teaming up of the two. This deal, no doubt would disappoint Ohio fans, however, as the roles are reversed. The campaigns cannot afford to lose this very important state. Southwestern voters are Stark fans, with Wayne a possible alternative, but nowhere close to even being a meaningful challenge in Texas or Arizona. The foggiest vote is in the Pacific Northwest where there are respectful showings for all but the Wayne camp. Hawaii and Alaska, although not big point getters favor the Stark and Aang straightforwardness.
As varied as these results are, there is nothing straightforward about the campaigns, and if there is any agreement in the political world, it is that the Vice Presidential selection will turn the tide for voters. If not this, then the campaign headquarters may start thinking about the power of political coalitions, and the deals that can be cut such as an endorsement for cabinet position bargaining chip for those who refuse to fall by the proverbial wayside.
10/24/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Rolling Stone
Finally the face of grunge has a candidate. Garage band artists of the 1990s, move over for garbage band artiste Oscar the Grouch (OTG in textspeak) of the 20teens. The four years of leadership that will steer this country in the direction it needs is green, is ugged up, and is as real as they get. Rolling Stone has prided itself on the real side of the music scene and has religiously steered clear of the political arena in favour of the concert venues where great acts have made a name for themselves. Today Rolling Stone is breaking that tradition, because we here have also had a tradition of knowing swag when we see it. (Tony Stark's the only one who even approaches the SWAG meter....see: Rolling Stone banner hyperlinked at bottom)
But here it is:
RUReddy?
OMG:OTG's
got SWAG.
There the cat's out of the bag, the monsters out of the garbage can. The following of the young adult vote has Bieber trembling in his soprano vocals, has Twilight turning to dark nothingness, and has the popularity of the latest syles turning to grunge 2012.
What is the attraction to this less than polite permanent bad hair day grouch; why do the youth flock to his presentations as they did amidst the cool October air of St. Louis only two nights back, with Jennifer Lopez, and a whole string of surprise guest celebrating into the wee hours of the morning as OTG fever had come to a climax. The feel of the city was alive, was oddly, as if there was a victory already won. This party is the Saintly city has positivity reign supreme, ironically, from the candidate that is often thought of as the most somber, and perhaps the most irritable of the line of Presidential hopefuls.
What gave OTG the facelift he needed was, in fact, the company he kept. A line of superstars came in support, and the parks of the city came alive with music.
Music, in fact, seemed to liven up the crowd, and music, in fact, is exactly the feel good campaign of the century, as if OTG kept politics out of the political campaign. This formula worked miracles and already the 18-24 demographically are promising their ballots come November 6th. Somehow, OTG found his groove, and it struck chords with the upandcomings.
Rolling Stone was there to record the incredible night and as photo after photo was taken, after song after song was sung, no one seemed to ask, what attracted the musicians to support this grouch complainer. If such a question mattered, it certainly didn't seem so to the newly enfranchised who with the body passes and the chopping of the air just felt thankful that finally a candidate had a good playlist. See pics in the latest Rolling Stone at:
http://demott.weebly.com/world-lit-11.html
10/23/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
New York Herald Tribune
Welcome to the 1920s
OpEd
Just reading the platform of the progressive candidate Aang the Avatar makes the most certain and steadfast of voters, well, dubious, at best. Filled with well meaning trite-isms, the platform is, well, without form. Aang jumps on the "let's reduce our foreign oil dependency" bandwagon and touts a new world of alternative energy as if windmills and solar panels were stocking stuffers on St. Nicks Days and the lumps of coal were left for the naughty boys and girls of America. Well, Aang's campaign no doubt will have to explain why Santa's two lists somehow got mixed up....and how Canada (the United States friendliest neighbor, eh?) which is filled with untapped resources and shares the world's largest amiable political boundary - stretching upwards of 3000 miles....how beloved Canada somehow got into the same sentence as South American oilmongers (translated as Venezuela and the sulphur smelling Chavez) is beyond any American loving patriot.
Scientist are certain that there are cleaner energies in our future. No one is certain as to who will pay for the development of these energies. Certainly Aang, or any of his compatriot candidates - who frankly are hiding behind the potential media fallout of the first platform offering of all the Presidential hopefuls, does not make anything more than a passing mention of monetary concerns. Suffice it to say we know Aang is concerned. This is as good as furrowing your brow in displeasure. It feels good to have someone on your side, until, well, until a solution is needed. I won't bore voters with the reality of facts and logic and the like...rather I'll let our correspondents in Minnesota do that in their scathing look at the reality of energy independence. Take ten minutes to peruse the following: http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/npr.php?id=163573768 and see how much sense Aang is making.
Conservatives, especially those in highly militarized communities are concerned as well, and I'm sure there is a whole lot of brow furrowing going on in the Colorado Springs, Anapolisis, and Fort Braggs around our nation. In the platform published at http://demott.weebly.com/platforms.html one can read phrases which call the military a "political puppet", and states in no uncertain terms that the US is not obliged to serve as a "global police force" calling for a reduction of US military prescence around the world, as budgets are examined to prevent the "syphoning" of funds. Let's rephrase these patriotic words as a general attitude that the economic crisis existing today is the fault of a budgetary loophole - i.e. the military, the very men and women who throw their lives in harms way to protect the very values hold as self evident. The values, however, of the military, according to the Aang team is that this great nation is nothing but the creator of "conflict" and "destruction". An interesting choice of words from a candidate who spends most of his time OUT of the country he proposes to lead. I remind the dear reading public that all of this is in black and white on the platform page and comes directly from the Aang campaign team.
So I urge the dear voters to vote for this extraordinary candidate. Cast your ballot for someone who wishes to return the US to the isolationalism that was the 1920s. Enjoy the quickstep of the Charleston and the flash of knee that the flappers may show off, but also don't forget that this was the decade that led to the Great Depression and ten years later the most destructive war in human history.
Now before you turn away from the ballot box, I urge you to read the other candidate's platforms, which as of today, have yet to go to press. So alongside the manifesto that is dubious at best from the Aang campaign team, there is a lot of empty dead space, and the irony is, as I type this, I still wonder, is it better to vote for the destruction that is known or that which is unknown and unpublished?
10/22/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Houston Herald
It's Official. The Sensational Six will go head to head to head to head to head to head! Candidates officially announce their run for President.
First on the A list: (Candidate A)The Bruce Wayne campaign invites the public to an opening ceremony at the Washington Monument to official announce his candidacy. Amongst others expected to attend include Ben Affleck, Tom Hanks, and Celine Dion.
Meanwhile, Aang (Candidate B), the Last Airbender star, is projected to officially announce the candidacy for the highest office on a H'Oprah Special one hour production, along with talk show superstar Oprah Winfrey.
Oscar the Grouch (Candidate C), on the other hand, teams up with Jenny from the Block (music icon Jennifer Lopez) to announce his run in St. Louis Central, alongside the good people of America.
Tony Stark's (Candidate D) official run begins as well. In Stark fashion, viewers should watch the airwaves as television commercials will run continuously until the November 6th election.
Courage, the Cowardly Dog (Candidate E), plans to do a take it to the streets campaign, in which representatives hit the door to door market in fifty metropolitian areas, to say vote for the Underdog.
Candidate Big Bird's (Candidate F) campaign is also launched today, mainly in a statement made by his campaign representatives.
All the platforms, commercials, and campaign material can be found on individual campaign pages, as well as the individual banners on www.demott.weebly.com .
10/21/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Hollywood Today!
Hollywood has its faceoff. Tony and Bruce, filled with Hollywood Juice. A short stroll through the pictorial history of both Stark and Wayne shows that they both know how to accessorize. Blonde for Tony? Brunette for Bruce? Well, the answer to this delicious dilema is revealed only depending how many scrapbook pages back you turn. No doubt this precious gents phone lists would be national best sellers - from supermodels to high school crushes ... but what does this say for the ability to lead the free world? Gender equality no doubt will take a back seat to these two's gender whims. Just a look at the employment staffing of both entrepreneurs reveals something very very traditional....the glass ceiling for the female manager is quite low, and no, count them, no females advance into the upper circle of power so coveted in both supranational organizations. Is this what the world needs - a step back into 1950s sensibilities?
Outside these playboys, America is introduced to the players of Sesame Street, both with fanbases of their own, both with a big yellow (or green) question mark as to the serious nature of their campaigns. Although the following is great, do we not need to ask, is this just another Children's Crusade....if so, let's not forget what happened in the last Children's Crusade. Do we want such leadership?
The third face off, if you can call it that , is an almost faceless faceoff. The no names of the campaign. Can we afford the mystery? The shadows of a Curious Who? Aang Who? Which one is that? Is that how we want our international image to be perceived? If so, I might suggest a simple close your eyes and pick tactic. I've plenty of phone books I can loan you at the voter booth.
10/20/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Independent Poll Shows Cloudy Future
Associated Press
Results from a weeklong poll from POLLSTAR, a DC based survey and marketing company with no political affiliations, shows a luke warm reception to the candidates. Having polled nearly 1,000 respondants in the greater DC area, POLLSTAR officials state that "there is no clear winner; and no clear loser. Depending on the question, different candidates come out on top, and others sink to the bottom." Officials would like to remind the public that the poll was for preassessment only, and have no real outcome on actual voting.
A full analysis of this weeks report can be found on their website. A summary review is below. The numbers by the side of each candidate is the percentage of people who felt the candidate would be stronger than or as strong as the competition.
Foreign policy: B. Wayne (52); Aang (43); Oscar the Grouch (15); Tony Stark (74); Curious (16); Big Bird (46)
Economic policy: B. Wayne (75); Aang (21); Oscar the Grouch (21); Tony Stark (71); Curious (24); Big Bird (31)
Education policy: B. Wayne (21); Aang (25); Oscar the Grouch (42); Tony Stark (30); Curious (36); Big Bird (68)
Gender Equality: B. Wayne (18); Aang (43); Oscar the Grouch (48); Tony Stark (9); Curious (69); Big Bird (71)
Religious Values: B. Wayne (25); Aang (32); Oscar the Grouch (22); Tony Stark (16); Curious (44); Big Bird (53)
Job Creation: B. Wayne (75); Aang (22); Oscar the Grouch (11); Tony Stark (78); Curious (36); Big Bird (31)
Upholding 2nd Amendment: B. Wayne (86); Aang (42); Oscar the Grouch (35); Tony Stark (97); Curious (37); Big Bird (22)
Social Programs: B. Wayne (35); Aang (39); Oscar the Grouch (36); Tony Stark (37); Curious (68); Big Bird (42)
Environment: B. Wayne (42); Aang (68); Oscar the Grouch (10); Tony Stark (40); Curious (66); Big Bird (62)
Arts: B. Wayne (11); Aang (35); Oscar the Grouch (20); Tony Stark (44); Curious (75); Big Bird (74)
10/19/2012
EXCERPT FROM:
Presidentially Pool Dubious, Says Political Junkie Henry O'Hara
OpEd
Today the intention to run for the highest office in the land by 6 candidates leaves, well, a sour taste in the mouth. On Monday of this upcoming week the expectation is that the ballot box will include the likes of two upper class playboys (Gothem City's Bruce Wayne and the "iron" hero of warmonger Tony Stark), one firey ball of negativity, the bull moose Oscar "the Grouch", two no-names in Curious and Aang, both who make us wonder if we might get the write in candidate to get more votes, and one idealistic big yellow optimist who will smile his way into a happy song, as our enemies will push him this way and that.
Given this pool, I might consider applying for my passport and looking for work in some of the American companies already overseas.
What is interesting is how each will approach the issues of today. I, for one, will be glued to my tv as the ads come through and the platforms become public....